My 4 engineering books go FREE on Kindle Fri 6 – Tue 10 Nov (PT). See the books → FREE on Kindle now: all 4 engineering books, until Tue 10 Nov 11:59 pm PT. Ends in . Grab yours → My 4 books: FREE on Kindle Fri 6 – Tue 10 Nov (PT). See → FREE on Kindle now: 4 books, left Grab yours →

API 653 Tank Welding: What the Exam Tests

By Sandeep Bandyopadhyay, Senior aerospace engineer · PMP, MBA, Six Sigma

TL;DR

Domain II of the API 653 body of knowledge asks you to review a welding procedure specification, a procedure qualification record and a welder performance qualification against ASME Section IX and API 653. The review is limited to SMAW or GMAW, one process per document, one PQR behind each WPS and P-No. 1 base metals. You also need the general welding rules in API 650 Section 9 and API 653 Section 11.

Original questions, not exam dumps. Every CertCrafter question is written from the published body of knowledge and the referenced codes. None is copied from a live exam, and CertCrafter is independent: not affiliated with or endorsed by any awarding body.

A tanker truck driver beside storage tanks at an oil field
Photo: Oil truck driver - Sergeant Major - Evanson Place - Arnegard North Dakota - 2013-07-04 (9287574559) by Tim Evanson from Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, United States of America (Wikimedia Commons), CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Most API 653 candidates lose welding marks on paperwork, not on technique. The exam asks whether the records in front of you prove the weld was allowed.

What does the welding domain of API 653 cover?

It is domain II, titled Welding on Atmospheric Aboveground Storage Tanks. The body of knowledge says the inspector should have the knowledge and skills to review a Welding Procedure Specification (WPS), a Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) and a Welder Performance Qualification (WPQ).

Three jobs sit inside that sentence. First, the procedure and qualification records must comply with the ASME code and any extra API 653 requirements. Next comes the question of whether the essential and non-essential variables were properly addressed. Last, you judge whether the welder is qualified to make the production weld the WPS describes.

A fourth sits beside them. The PQR lists mechanical tests, and you judge whether they are the right tests and whether the results are acceptable.

Video: API 653 — Myth: API 653 is only for crude oil storage. API 653 — Myth: API 653 is only for crude oil storage. Watch on YouTube · CertCrafter
Image: video thumbnail, source: CertCrafter on YouTube (@certcrafters).

The channel’s short on the myth that API 653 is only for crude oil storage is a quick reminder that this inspector’s job covers many stored products.

How do the WPS, PQR and WPQ fit together?

Think of a chain. The PQR is the test record: a coupon was welded, tested, and the results written down. The WPS is the instruction the welder follows in production, and it must reference the PQR that supports it. The WPQ shows that a welder passed a test coupon welded to a qualified WPS.

The body of knowledge adds a small rule that is easy to forget: the PQR must be signed and dated.

Three boxes in a row: the PQR, the WPS that cites it, and the welder's WPQ tested to a qualified WPS, all feeding the question of whether this welder is qualified for this weld
How the three records link. Illustration: CertCrafter, from API 653 Body of Knowledge, March 2027.

What is in scope and what is excluded?

The scope is narrow on purpose. That is good news, because Section IX is a large code and you only need a slice of it.

Limit What the body of knowledge says
Processes SMAW or GMAW only
Per document One process on a single WPS, PQR or WPQ
Support The WPS is supported by a single PQR
Filler metals One per process
Base metals P-No. 1
Coupon The WPQ test coupon is welded to a qualified WPS

Several things are specifically excluded: dissimilar base metal joints, powdered filler metals and consumable inserts, special processes such as overlay and hard-facing, Charpy impact requirements and supplementary essential variables. Any PQR and WPS on the exam will not include heat treatment requirements.

Skip those topics. The hours you save belong to the calculations and the open-book lookups.

What do inspectors actually check on a repair job?

On site, the welding paperwork arrives before the welder strikes an arc. A contractor sends a package for a shell repair, and the inspector reads it against the job.

The useful habit is to start from the production weld and work backward. What process will be used? The procedure that covers it comes next, then the record that supports that procedure. Last, who will run it, and does that welder’s qualification cover this joint?

Field mistakes usually sit in the links, not in the words. A WPS that names a PQR which does not exist in the package. A welder qualified on a different procedure. A record that was never signed. Each one is a stop, however good the weld might look.

Oil well site with gas tanks and a moisture tank on open ground
Photo: Sergeant Major oil well and gas tanks and moisture tank - Evanson Place - Arnegard North Dakota - 2013-07-04 (9287570705) by Tim Evanson from Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, United States of America (Wikimedia Commons), CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Worked example: reviewing a record package

These documents are invented for practice. A contractor proposes SMAW for a shell repair and submits one WPS, one PQR and one WPQ.

  1. Count the processes. The WPS, PQR and WPQ each show SMAW only, so the one-process rule holds.
  2. Check the link. The WPS names the PQR it relies on, and that PQR is the one in the package.
  3. Check the PQR itself. It is signed and dated, and it states the values actually used on the coupon.
  4. Compare the variables. Each essential variable on the WPS must be supported by the PQR, and the non-essential variables must be addressed too.
  5. Read the mechanical tests. Are they the right tests for the coupon, and are the results acceptable?
  6. Match the welder. The WPQ coupon was welded to a qualified WPS. Does it cover the position and the joint the production weld needs?

One failed step stops the package. The exam question will usually hide the failure in one line of a long scenario.

The API 653 Complete Exam Kit puts more of these records in front of you under timed conditions, with every answer explained.

Which general welding rules do you need?

Two documents carry them. In API 650 Section 9 the body of knowledge lists typical joints and definitions, weld sizes, restrictions on joints, maximum allowable reinforcement and inspection requirements. In API 653 Section 11 you need the general rules for welding on tanks already in service.

The March 2027 effectivity sheet lists API 650 in its 14th Edition of August 2025, API 653 with Addenda 1 through 4, and ASME Section IX in the 2025 Edition, welding only.

Five steps in order: read the WPS, find its one PQR, check variables, check mechanical tests, match the welder WPQ
The review in the order a clean answer follows. Illustration: CertCrafter, from API 653 Body of Knowledge, March 2027.

Where do candidates lose marks on welding questions?

Scope creep comes first. Candidates read a Section IX chapter on special processes and spend a weekend on material the exam excludes.

Second, mixing up what each record holds. A PQR states the values used on the test coupon. Ranges belong on the WPS. A question that offers a PQR with ranges is telling you something.

Third, missing the open-book split. Some welding items are open-book and some are closed-book, and a closed-book item will not let you look anything up. Know the basic rules cold.

Fourth, reading the welder qualification too generously. Passing a test on one procedure does not make a welder qualified for every weld.

Two free questions in the kit’s sample set show the framing: one is about electrodes left exposed on a tank repair, the other about a PQR on A283 plate. Try the free quiz first and note how each scenario hides its answer in one detail.

What should you study first?

Read the domain II text of the body of knowledge twice, then list the exclusions so you stop worrying about them. Practice the six-step review on any set of records you can find, and say out loud which link failed. After that, drill the API 650 Section 9 and API 653 Section 11 topics named above.

The API 653 product page holds the exam facts, the full bundle has the welding items marked closed-book or open-book, and the guides hub lists the rest. To see how mistakes cluster across domains, read API 653 common mistakes.

Try these free questions

  1. A canister of E7018 electrodes sat open on the scaffold overnight beside T-305 during rain, and the welder wants to run them out in the morning on a shell insert repair. What should the inspector direct?

    1. Let the welder use them after a visual check for cracked or flaking coating, since moisture affects only the appearance of the flux and not the deposited weld metal.
    2. Let the welder use them on fillet and attachment welds only, keeping them off the full penetration seams where weld soundness matters most.
    3. Have the electrodes dried with a torch at the joint immediately before striking the arc, which drives off surface moisture and restores the coating.
    4. Take them out of service for rebaking or disposal within the manufacturer's exposure limits, because a low hydrogen coating that has absorbed moisture invites porosity and hydrogen cracking.
    Show the answer and explanation

    Answer: D. The whole point of a low hydrogen electrode is a coating that carries very little moisture, and that property is lost once the coating has been exposed to a wet atmosphere beyond the permitted exposure time. Moisture dissociates in the arc and delivers hydrogen into the weld pool and the heat affected zone, where it produces porosity and, in a restrained shell insert, delayed cracking that may not appear until after the examination is finished. Exposed electrodes must therefore go back for rebaking within the limits the manufacturer and the site procedure allow, or be scrapped. The first option treats moisture pickup as cosmetic. The second confines suspect consumables to fillet welds, as though an attachment weld cracking into the shell were acceptable. The third substitutes a torch for controlled rebaking, which heats the surface without driving moisture from the depth of the coating and can damage the flux while giving false confidence.

  2. [Open book] On a course 1 shell plate replacement in TK-4120 the welder is drawing E7018 electrodes from an open cardboard box left overnight in a humid yard. Root porosity appears on the film and a hairline crack shows up a day after welding. What should the inspector require?

    1. Raise preheat to 300 degF and carry on welding with the same box of electrodes.
    2. Take the exposed electrodes out of service and weld from sealed or heated storage.
    3. Switch to a cellulosic E6010 electrode for the fill and cover passes of the joint.
    4. Accept the welds provided the radiographs meet the film density requirement of the code.
    Show the answer and explanation

    Answer: B. Low hydrogen SMAW electrodes such as E7018 pick up moisture from the air, and that moisture becomes hydrogen in the arc. Hydrogen diffuses into the heat affected zone and produces porosity and delayed cracking that can appear hours after welding is finished, which is the pattern described here. API RP 577 covers consumable control for exactly this reason: coated electrodes are kept in sealed containers or in heated holding ovens at the temperature the manufacturer specifies, exposure time out of storage is limited, and electrodes exposed beyond that limit are either reconditioned to the manufacturer's baking schedule or discarded. Option 1 raises preheat, which helps hydrogen diffuse out but does nothing about a wet coating and does not license the use of ruined consumables. Option 3 swaps in a cellulosic electrode that deliberately runs with high hydrogen, the opposite of what this joint needs. Option 4 treats a film quality check as evidence of soundness, and delayed cracking may not exist yet when the film is shot.

Take the full free 10-question sample with scoring →

Frequently asked questions

Which welding processes can an API 653 procedure review include?

Only SMAW or GMAW. The body of knowledge adds that no more than one process appears on a single WPS, PQR or WPQ, and that the WPS under review is supported by a single PQR. Filler metals are limited to one per process.

Is brazing on the API 653 exam?

No. The body of knowledge notes that candidates should know the basic welding qualification requirements of ASME Section IX for procedures and welding personnel, and states that brazing is not covered on the exam.

Which welding rules besides ASME Section IX do you need?

The general welding rules in API 650 Section 9, such as typical joints and definitions, weld sizes, restrictions on joints, maximum allowable reinforcement and inspection requirements, plus the general welding rules in API 653 Section 11.

Official sources

  1. API 653 Body of Knowledge, March 2027 — accessed 28 October 2026
  2. API 653 Publications Effectivity Sheet, March 2027 — accessed 28 October 2026
  3. API 653 Aboveground Storage Tank Inspector certification page — accessed 28 October 2026

Exam rules change. Check the awarding body's official page before you apply. CertCrafter is independent and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any awarding body.

Was this helpful?

Comments

    Comments are read by a person before they appear. How we moderate.